ArticlePolymers2026
Mechanical Performance of FDM-Printed PLA Joined by Portable Friction Stir Welding: Influence of Infill Density and Tool Pin Geometry.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the mechanical performance of FDM-printed poly(lactic acid) (PLA) structures joined using a portable Friction Stir Welding (FSW) device. A non-destructive optical band method was employed to assess weld homogeneity and material flow consistency. The influence of substrate infill density (15% and 100%) and tool pin geometry (cylindrical and truncated conical) was systematically analyzed. Results indicate that substrate density is the primary determinant of joint integrity; 100% infill specimens demonstrated superior structural homogeneity and consistent intensity profiles, whereas 15% infill specimens exhibited significant intensity fluctuations and poor consolidation, even with the addition of filler material. The mechanical evaluation revealed that the use of a tool pin is essential for effective load transfer, as specimens welded without internal agitation achieved only baseline tensile strengths of approximately 4 MPa. Among the pin-driven configurations, the cylindrical geometry outperformed the truncated conical design, reaching a peak tensile stress of 8.02 ± 1.42 MPa, corresponding to a joint efficiency of 27% relative to the 100% infill base material, compared to 6.25 ± 1.43 MPa. This performance gap is attributed to the cylindrical pin's ability to maintain higher shear rates and more uniform pressure distribution at the weld root. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of portable FSW for structural joining of additively manufactured polymers and establish critical processing parameters for the optimization of portable FSW in engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.