Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122630›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning Applications with Sensors for Indoor Air Quality Research.

Cosmina-Mihaela Rosca, Adrian Stancu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cosmina-Mihaela RoscaDepartment of Automatic Control, Computers, and Electronics, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 39 Bucharest Avenue, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-3321
Adrian StancuDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 39 Bucharest Avenue, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5366-8149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, people spend over 80% of their lives indoors, which makes indoor air quality (IAQ) research important. The paper presents, firstly, a structured overview of publicly available IAQ datasets suitable for machine learning (ML) research, secondly, a comparative analysis of the reviewed datasets, thirdly, an ML-oriented mapping between tasks and algorithms, to outline the algorithmic families that are most appropriate given the dataset structure and the prediction target, and fourthly, an investigation on IAQ-ML using custom-made solutions that include sensors for data acquisition. The methodology included an analysis of 1162 papers from the Web of Science, 1536 from Scopus, and 756 from IEEE Xplore, between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2025, to capture recent trends in ML-based IAQ research. The findings show that linear regression (132 articles), Logistic regression (91), random forest-RF (77), Long Short-Term Memory-LSTM (77), Principal Component Analysis (63), and Elastic Net are the most popular among researchers. Most studies report accuracy over 90%, with maximum values of 99.37% for LSTM and 99.20% for RF. In the case of regression, the R

Indexed as

air quality predictionindoor air quality indexmachine learningpublic and private datasetssensor-based monitoringsmart buildingstime series modeling

Identifiers

PMID42122630
PMCPMC13165709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.