ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning Applications with Sensors for Indoor Air Quality Research.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible Gait Sensing and Machine Learning Recognition Based on Phase-Separated PVDF-HFP Films.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An IoT-Edge Enabled Deep-Fuzzy Hybrid Model for Real-Time Indoor Air Quality Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, people spend over 80% of their lives indoors, which makes indoor air quality (IAQ) research important. The paper presents, firstly, a structured overview of publicly available IAQ datasets suitable for machine learning (ML) research, secondly, a comparative analysis of the reviewed datasets, thirdly, an ML-oriented mapping between tasks and algorithms, to outline the algorithmic families that are most appropriate given the dataset structure and the prediction target, and fourthly, an investigation on IAQ-ML using custom-made solutions that include sensors for data acquisition. The methodology included an analysis of 1162 papers from the Web of Science, 1536 from Scopus, and 756 from IEEE Xplore, between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2025, to capture recent trends in ML-based IAQ research. The findings show that linear regression (132 articles), Logistic regression (91), random forest-RF (77), Long Short-Term Memory-LSTM (77), Principal Component Analysis (63), and Elastic Net are the most popular among researchers. Most studies report accuracy over 90%, with maximum values of 99.37% for LSTM and 99.20% for RF. In the case of regression, the R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.