ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Exploratory Analysis of Postural Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using a Smartphone IMU Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a growing need for highly accessible and simplified methods to track postural control in adults affected by neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the validity of smartphone-derived postural control analyses compared with traditional center-of-pressure (COP) measures in healthy adults and people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsA total of 36 participants (21 controls, 15 T2DM) completed static postural testing during single- and double-leg stance, also with eyes open and eyes closed. Data from a smartphone attached to the lower back measured trunk acceleration (SP-ACC) concurrently with gold-standard center of pressure (COP). The root mean square (RMS) and movement velocity (MV) were extracted from both trunk acceleration and COP data. The effect of balance condition and groups were statistically evaluated using non-parametric statistical tests.
resultsSP-ACC and COP metrics showed progressive sway increases with task difficulty in both groups (all
conclusionsSmartphone-based IMU assessments showed good agreement with COP analysis and detected condition-specific balance deficits in T2DM. These findings support smartphone-based IMU metrics as a promising tool for accessible and scalable balance screening in diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.