ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Physics-Enhanced Orthogonal Sensing for Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection in Rolling Mills.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rolling mill guiding system is a key component that affects the quality of steel products. However, due to the harsh on-site environment, there is usually a lack of effective online monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Moreover, in industrial environments, fault samples are very scarce, making supervised artificial intelligence methods difficult to apply. This paper proposes a "physics-enhanced" orthogonal-sensing cyber-physical architecture that integrates hardware and software design. At the hardware level, an embedded orthogonal sensing layout (P⟂V) is designed to decouple drive-chain vibration from rolling-force fluctuations at the transducer level. At the algorithm level, the state monitoring of the guiding system is formulated as a self-supervised anomaly detection problem, and a two-branch network architecture is designed: one branch uses the CSD transformer to capture physical coupling characteristics, while the other branch uses VQ-VAE to extract operating-condition context. Experimental results on a dataset comprising real operational data and expert-validated synthetic fault scenarios show that the system achieves an AUC-ROC of 0.952 and a false alarm rate of 0.048 under a 95% TPR, with an end-to-end processing latency of approximately 8 ms per window and a system-level fault response time of approximately 108 ms, and thus meets the requirements of real-time industrial monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.