ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness and Clinical Safety of Quantized Hierarchical Transformers for Edge-Based Malaria Microscopy.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PolypSAM-Open: Mitigating Automation Bias in AI-Assisted Colonoscopy via Open-Set Surgical Artifact Rejection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable Lightweight AI for the Identification of Right-Sided Cardiac Dysfunction in a Saudi Arabian Diabetic Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated mobile microscopy in Internet of Things (IoT) networks is essential for scaling malaria screening in resource-constrained environments. Deploying standard convolutional architectures here introduces severe adversarial vulnerabilities. Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) mitigates hardware constraints by converting floating-point models to 8-bit integers (INT8); however, its impact on clinical safety and security remains unexplored. This study presents an adversarial audit of quantized Vision Transformers for medical edge deployment. We evaluated a Swin-Tiny transformer against ViT-Tiny and MobileNetV3 baselines using a 27,558-image malaria dataset and an out-of-distribution (OOD) White Blood Cell dataset. Our findings redefine the "Quantization Shield" hypothesis. PTQ compresses the Swin model by 3.9× (to 27.89 MB) with a negligible 0.11% accuracy drop, maintaining statistical reliability on OOD tests. However, the hypothesized architectural resilience shatters under white-box Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks. Despite robustness against single-step attacks, both MobileNetV3 and the INT8 Swin-Tiny collapse to 0.00% accuracy under iterative PGD. Conversely, the quantized Swin-Tiny resists black-box transfer attacks from a surrogate, maintaining 81.00% accuracy. We conclude that while quantized Vision Transformers meet mobile sensor constraints, integer quantization provides zero innate defense against targeted iterative perturbations, exposing a critical vulnerability in diagnostic IoT networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.