Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122606›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Dual-Sided Sparse Aggregation for Edge Sensing Systems.

He Zhao, Jingwei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

He ZhaoSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9016-6715
Jingwei LiSchool of Telecommunications Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed edge sensing systems, such as IoT monitoring nodes, wearable devices, and camera-based sensing terminals, continuously generate privacy-sensitive data that are costly to transmit to a central server. Federated learning (FL) provides a promising solution for collaborative model training without raw-data sharing; however, its practical deployment in edge sensing systems is challenged by non-IID local observations, limited uplink/downlink resources, and restricted on-device computation. To address these issues, this paper proposes a Dual-Sided Sparse Aggregation (DSSA) mechanism integrated with FedProx for resource-constrained edge sensing environments. In the proposed framework, the server prunes the global model after each communication round and transmits only the retained parameters, while clients update the complementary parameters and upload sparse local gradients. This fixed-structure sparse training strategy reduces bidirectional communication overhead and local computation cost, while FedProx improves robustness under heterogeneous data distributions. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and SVHN with varying non-IID degrees, pruning ratios, and hyperparameter settings show that the proposed method achieves a favorable resource-performance trade-off, reducing communication cost by up to 73.0% and computation cost by up to 34.9% while maintaining competitive accuracy. Under controlled benchmark settings, the proposed method demonstrates substantial resource savings compared with FedAvg, particularly in mildly heterogeneous scenarios, indicating a favorable benchmark-level resource-performance trade-off for resource-constrained edge sensing scenarios under the evaluated settings.

Indexed as

communication efficiencyfederated learningFedProx regularizationmodel pruningnon-IID data

Identifiers

PMID42122606
PMCPMC13165942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.