ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Comparative Study of Signal Representations Methods and Deep Learning Architectures for PPG-Based Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and requires effective long-term monitoring. Photoplethysmography (PPG), acquired from wearable optical sensors, offers a convenient and non-invasive signal source for cuffless blood pressure (BP) estimation, but existing studies have mainly emphasized model architecture optimization, with limited systematic investigation of signal representation. This study systematically compares seven one-dimensional-to-two-dimensional signal transformation methods and evaluates multiple architectural variants for PPG-based cuffless BP estimation under a unified framework. Experiments were conducted using PPG and arterial BP signals from the UCI Open Blood Pressure Database. The best-performing configuration, based on continuous wavelet transform (CWT), achieved estimation errors of 3.80 ± 5.02 mmHg for systolic BP and 1.65 ± 2.70 mmHg for diastolic BP. Further real-world validation on 26 participants using an Omron cuff-based monitor as the reference showed good consistency, with correlation coefficients of R = 0.96 for SBP and R = 0.74 for DBP. The results demonstrate that appropriate signal representation, particularly CWT, plays a critical role in improving estimation accuracy and robustness, and may facilitate the development of wearable cuffless BP monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.