ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hierarchical Deep Learning Framework for Skin Disease and Cancer Classification Performance Enhancement.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the number of people who have been investigated for skin cancer has increased significantly worldwide. For prior diagnosis, dermatologists can typically visually inspect skin lesions for abnormalities. However, an expert is required, and the similarity of some skin lesions remains challenging. This study aimed to address the challenge of classifying multiple images of skin conditions, including both Benign and Malignant groups, using the hierarchical method. Instead of directly performing multi-class classification using a single model, multiple binary classification models were organized to reduce task complexity and improve overall performance. In the methodology, four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-18, and ResNet-50, were selected as candidates for this problem. The proposed hierarchical binary classification model was evaluated against conventional multi-class classification methods. As a result, various evaluation metrics were used to assess model performance, with recall as the primary metric in this study, given the emphasis on minimizing false negatives. However, some results revealed discrepancies between the highest recall and other performance metrics. Further analysis demonstrated the potential of using recall as a selection criterion for identifying the most suitable CNN models. The single model-based classification of six classes of skin lesion images achieves the highest recall of 60.27% with MobileNetV2. Meanwhile, the proposed hierarchical model achieves a higher recall of 82.62%, representing a significant increase of 22.35%. Additionally, improvements were observed across all other evaluation metrics, including accuracy (+25.46%), precision (+17.21%), F1-score (+21.34%), balanced accuracy (+12.69%), specificity (+3.03%), and G-mean (+14.25%). These improvements indicate enhanced performance in correctly identifying both positive and negative cases, while reducing misclassification rates. This outcome demonstrates the potential to improve the model's generalizability, thereby increasing its applicability across various clinical decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.