Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122557›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Hierarchical Deep Learning Framework for Skin Disease and Cancer Classification Performance Enhancement.

Chanapa Chaitan, Sasithorn Tengjongdee, Suejit Pechprasarn, Kitsada Thadson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chanapa ChaitanCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Sasithorn TengjongdeeCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Suejit PechprasarnCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9105-8627
Kitsada ThadsonCenter of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence & Supercomputing, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0004-5845-9057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the number of people who have been investigated for skin cancer has increased significantly worldwide. For prior diagnosis, dermatologists can typically visually inspect skin lesions for abnormalities. However, an expert is required, and the similarity of some skin lesions remains challenging. This study aimed to address the challenge of classifying multiple images of skin conditions, including both Benign and Malignant groups, using the hierarchical method. Instead of directly performing multi-class classification using a single model, multiple binary classification models were organized to reduce task complexity and improve overall performance. In the methodology, four convolutional neural network (CNN) models, namely MobileNetV2, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-18, and ResNet-50, were selected as candidates for this problem. The proposed hierarchical binary classification model was evaluated against conventional multi-class classification methods. As a result, various evaluation metrics were used to assess model performance, with recall as the primary metric in this study, given the emphasis on minimizing false negatives. However, some results revealed discrepancies between the highest recall and other performance metrics. Further analysis demonstrated the potential of using recall as a selection criterion for identifying the most suitable CNN models. The single model-based classification of six classes of skin lesion images achieves the highest recall of 60.27% with MobileNetV2. Meanwhile, the proposed hierarchical model achieves a higher recall of 82.62%, representing a significant increase of 22.35%. Additionally, improvements were observed across all other evaluation metrics, including accuracy (+25.46%), precision (+17.21%), F1-score (+21.34%), balanced accuracy (+12.69%), specificity (+3.03%), and G-mean (+14.25%). These improvements indicate enhanced performance in correctly identifying both positive and negative cases, while reducing misclassification rates. This outcome demonstrates the potential to improve the model's generalizability, thereby increasing its applicability across various clinical decision-support systems.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSkin DiseasesSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansNeural Networks, Computerconvolutional neural networksdeep learninghierarchical binary classificationmulti-class classificationskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID42122557
PMCPMC13165980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.