ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Blockchain-Enabled Uncertainty-Aware Passive Wi-Fi Localization for Secure Critical Infrastructure Sensor Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Passive Wi-Fi localization for critical-infrastructure security operations centers (SOCs) faces three interconnected limitations. First, many existing methods produce single-point coordinate estimates without calibrated uncertainty, making them unsuitable for automated SOC response. Second, localization pipelines often lack an evidentiary chain of custody, limiting reliable post-incident auditability. Third, SOC automation cannot safely rely on uncalibrated confidence values because erroneous high-impact actions and missed escalations carry asymmetric operational costs. This study presents a Blockchain-Enabled Uncertainty-Aware Passive Wi-Fi Localization framework for heterogeneous sensor networks composed of stationary sensors, mobile receivers, and UAV-assisted collection nodes. Instead of producing a single coordinate estimate, the method derives a posterior spatial distribution with calibrated uncertainty from monitor-mode observations, including RSSI aggregates, management/control frame features, channel occupancy indicators, and receiver logs. The framework combines three tightly coupled components: (i) Bayesian coordinate estimation with robust loss functions and range-dependent error modeling; (ii) uncertainty calibration that converts posterior confidence into operational SOC response modes (AUTO, VERIFY, and OBSERVE) via empirical coverage metrics and reliability diagrams; and (iii) a permissioned evidentiary logging layer that anchors integrity-relevant metadata and policy labels on-chain while keeping raw telemetry off-chain for tamper-evident auditability and scalability. The coupling between layers is explicit: calibrated confidence scores govern smart-contract gating conditions, and smart-contract policy thresholds feed back into the calibration stage. Field validation shows that localization performance degrades markedly beyond approximately 40 m, indicating a practical boundary for confident automated action. The proposed framework integrates passive sensing, uncertainty-aware localization, and blockchain-based evidentiary trust for secure critical-infrastructure sensor networks. Its key contributions are: (1) a posterior-distribution-based passive localization pipeline; (2) empirical coverage metrics for calibrating SOC response thresholds; (3) a hybrid on-chain/off-chain architecture linking localization outputs to a permissioned ledger; and (4) field validation establishing the 40 m operational validity boundary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.