ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Radar-Based Assessment of Sit-to-Stand Transitions as Digital Biomarkers of Pain and Physical Decline.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upper Limb Tremors Classification for Parkinson's Disease Using W-Band (76-81 GHz) Doppler Millimeter-Wave Sensing and Deep-Learning-Based Classifier.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sit-to-stand (STS) transitions are clinically informative indicators of functional independence and are sensitive to compensatory strategies associated with physical decline and pain. This study presents a non-contact, non-visual framework for quantitative STS assessment using a 60 GHz frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar in a residential setting. We developed a signal-processing pipeline that converts intermediate-frequency radar data into range-time intensity (RTI) maps, tracks dominant torso motion, and extracts temporal, kinematic, and spectral features. Experiments were conducted across two sensing orientations (subject-facing and side-facing), five mounting heights (45-153 cm), and three execution speeds, with approximately 30 repeated cycles per condition. For normal non-compensated STS transitions, radar-derived metrics reflected expected biomechanical scaling: mean full-cycle duration decreased from 23.90 s (slow) to 13.95 s (medium) and 7.98 s (fast), while peak ascent velocity increased from 0.311 m/s to 0.358 m/s and dominant cadence increased from 0.0416 Hz to 0.125 Hz. Simulated abnormal transitions produced distinct and quantifiable deviations. Preparatory rocking introduced an additional oscillatory phase (mean rocking duration 2.36 s), prolonging the standing transition to 4.80 s and altering trajectory regularity. Across configurations, subject-facing mid-torso mounting provided the most continuous and separable STS signatures, whereas side-facing placement and extreme heights reduced effective radial motion or introduced clutter artifacts. These findings establish practical deployment guidelines and demonstrate that radar-derived STS metrics can serve as candidate digital biomarkers for unobtrusive, privacy-preserving detection of mobility decline, compensatory pain behaviors, and functional impairment in real-world home environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.