ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Design and Analysis of Minimum-Weighted Connected Capacitated Vertex Cover Algorithms for Link Monitoring in IoT-Enabled WSNs.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are the backbone of IoT-enabled smart manufacturing, environmental monitoring, and industrial automation. However, their broadcast nature makes communication links vulnerable to eavesdropping, routing manipulation, and denial-of-service attacks. Strategically placing monitor nodes to check each link is an effective approach to protect against attacks, but energy, connectivity, and capacity constraints should be considered while picking monitor nodes. In this paper, we tackle the Minimum-Weighted Connected Capacitated Vertex Cover (MWCCVC) problem, which minimizes monitoring costs, ensures backbone connectivity, and adheres to per-node capacity constraints. Unlike prior works that consider weighted vertex cover, connectivity constraints, or capacitated variants separately, the proposed MWCCVC model jointly integrates all three dimensions within a single vertex cover-based monitoring framework. We first provide a Branch-and-Bound (B&B) solver with linear programming relaxation bounds and constraint-based pruning strategies that produces optimum solutions. Three constructive greedy heuristics (GD, GR, GW) and two hybrid genetic algorithms (HGA, HGA-v2) that combine parameterized greedy decoders with evolutionary search are proposed; all methods guarantee full edge coverage, induced-subgraph connectivity, and max-flow-validated capacity feasibility. Tests on 130 small, 160 medium, and 19 large benchmark instances show that HGA matches B&B optima on every small instance, beats the time-limited B&B by 6.6% on medium instances, where the percentage is computed based on the relative difference in average total weight with respect to B&B, and stays the best on large graphs with up to 1000 nodes. The HGA-v2 tries to balance the quality and speed, with only a 3.1% difference at 10× faster execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.