ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Webcam-Based Pain Measurement Using Pupillary Diameter.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pupillometry can be used as a method for monitoring pain. There are experimental conditions under which standard pupillometry equipment cannot be used. Studying the effects of different pulse forms used for transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is one such task. The aim was to create a system for recording pupil diameter based on a web camera because it can be synchronised with external equipment, which allows the diameter to be recorded simultaneously with other physiological signals. A markerless system for recording and analysing pupil diameter using deep neural networks was developed based on a commercially available web camera. The accuracy of this system was compared with the accuracy of measurements using manual analysis with ImageJ (version 1.54g). For validation, the system was tested in a study of the dependence of tolerance to tSCS on the shape of stimulating pulses, which involved volunteers (n = 12). The results of the developed pupillometry were compared with the pain rating scale traditionally used in such studies. The developed system is accurate in determining the pupil diameter, comparable to human accuracy. The pupillometry results reproduced those obtained using a subjective pain scale. This method was found to be a reliable method for recording nociceptive pupillary responses in electrophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.