ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Open-Source Nasometer.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypernasality is a common characteristic of several speech disorders and can significantly affect perceived speech intelligibility and quality. Nasometry quantifies nasalance by calculating the proportion of acoustic energy emitted from the nasal cavity relative to the combined nasal and oral acoustic output during speech production and is commonly used in clinical assessment and research. However, commercially available nasometers are costly and limited in portability, restricting their use in resource-limited or remote settings. The primary purpose of this study was to design and build a low-cost, open-source mobile nasometer prototype ("mNasometer") by leveraging advances in 3D printing, off-the-shelf electronic components, and a custom open-source mobile application. A secondary aim was to compare the electroacoustic and subjective performance of mNasometer with that of a gold-standard commercial nasometer. Electroacoustic analyses focused on comparing long-term averaged spectra and the oral/nasal acoustic isolation between the gold-standard commercial nasometer and the proposed mNasometer, which incorporates a 3D-printed nasal separation plate. In addition, nasalance scores were collected from ten healthy young adult participants using both systems during structured speech production tasks (i.e., reading standard passages or nasal sentences). Agreement between devices was evaluated using correlational analyses and comparative statistical procedures. Long-term averaged spectra exhibited similar profiles between the commercial nasometer and the mNasometer across different test stimuli, indicating comparable capture of stimulus energy distributions. Although the mNasometer demonstrated reduced oral-nasal acoustic isolation relative to the commercial system, objective nasalance scores followed similar overall trends between devices, with statistically significant stimulus-dependent differences observed. Frame-wise correlational analyses revealed significant correlations between nasalance measures obtained from the commercial nasometer and the mNasometer across most of the speech production tasks, suggesting that the reduced isolation did not critically compromise measurement correspondence. In summary, the low-cost, open-source mNasometer prototype provides nasalance measurements that show promising agreement with those of a gold-standard commercial device. Its reduced cost and increased portability suggest potential for expanded research and field-based applications in the objective assessment of nasalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.