ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
EdgeDenseCalib: Targetless Camera-LiDAR Calibration via Enhanced Edge Feature Densification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate camera-LiDAR calibration is a fundamental prerequisite for reliable perception in autonomous systems. However, traditional methods typically rely on manual intervention or specific calibration targets, which restrict their flexibility and scalability in dynamic, real-world environments. To address the challenge of targetless calibration, we propose EdgeDenseCalib, a novel approach driven by enhanced edge feature densification. A key innovation lies in a two-stage process designed to densify the inherently sparse edge features in LiDAR data, thereby making them highly comparable to the fine-grained edges present in images. Consequently, this facilitates more reliable feature matching between the two cross-modal data sources. An optimization algorithm is subsequently employed to refine the alignment and minimize the reprojection error. Experiments on the KITTI dataset show our method achieves accurate calibration results of 0.105° in mean rotation error and 0.903 cm in mean translation error. Compared to state-of-the-art edge-based methods, our approach significantly improves the rotation accuracy by 33.1% to 89.9%. This work provides a practical and automatic calibration solution, contributing to the development of more robust perception systems for autonomous applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.