ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensor-Based Assessment of Morning Prospective Memory in Narcolepsy Type 1: Evidence from Children and Adult Cohorts.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to shed light on activity-based prospective memory performance in children and adult patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) during the first sixty minutes after morning awakening. With reference to the children (C) sample, 21 C-NT1 patients and 20 healthy controls (C-HC) were enrolled; as regards adults (A), 31 A-NT1 patients and 51 A-HC were examined. Each participant used an actigraph for one week, being asked to press the event marker button at get-up time (prospective memory task-PMT). Computing the time interval between the get-up time and the moment the event marker button was pushed, no significant differences were observed in the children's groups. In contrast, in the adult groups, A-NT1 patients had a longer interval than A-HC. Moreover, the rate of compliant performers (those who remembered to push the event-marker button within 2 min of get-up time) and late performers was significantly different in adults only, with a low rate of compliant performers in A-NT1 patients. In C-NT1, a shorter cognitive inertia was associated with higher motor activity after awakening; in contrast, this association was not observed in A-NT1. Overall, the present pattern of results suggests that prospective memory performance is impaired only in NT1 adult patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.