ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Smart Wheelchair and Sensor System for Tracking Performance and Accessibility in Urban Environments.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wheelchair users face significant mobility limitations related to both medical issues (e.g., musculoskeletal strain, pressure ulcers) and urban accessibility challenges. This pilot study introduces a sensor system integrating an inertial measurement unit (IMU), GPS (Global Positioning System), and a pressure-measuring seat to monitor distance travelled, speed, and posture in relation to real-world conditions. Seven participants navigated an approximately 800-metre outdoor course, divided into 13 sections, while real-time data were recorded. The results showed an average speed of 1.24 ± 0.41 m/s with peak speeds of up to 2.67 m/s. The centre of pressure on the seat fluctuated by an average of 25 mm in the x and y directions (left-right: COPx, back-forward: COPy). The data for average speed, COPx, and COPy showed significant differences between most of the 13 sections, with large, very large, and huge effect sizes. Comparing the speed, COPx, and COPy data with respect to distance travelled, and correlating them between the seven participants by applying the rank-sum method to the mean R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.