ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automatic Tuning of Gaussian Filter for Image Vignetting Correction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image vignetting is a common optical artefact characterised by a gradual reduction in brightness towards the edges of an image. It degrades image quality and compromises radiometric accuracy, affecting a wide range of imaging applications. When vignetting cannot be avoided during acquisition, a computational correction is required. Existing methods often rely on Gaussian filtering of a flat-field image; however, selecting the appropriate filter parameters-particularly the standard deviation-remains challenging and is largely subjective. To address this issue, this paper presents the Gaussian filter with auto-tuned sigma (GFATS) method. This method leverages an optimisation framework to automatically tune filter parameters. This is achieved by aligning the filtered output with a specified polynomial model of the vignetting profile near the optical centre of the captured flat-field image. The tuned filter is then applied to the same image to derive the vignetting correction matrix. The proposed method was evaluated against established model-based correction methods across different lens-camera systems using objective quantitative measures. The results demonstrate that GFATS provides a more accurate vignetting estimation and improves the brightness uniformity of corrected images compared to existing approaches. It also effectively mitigates the overfitting issue inherent to standard low-pass filtering or smoothing methods. Notably, a single consistent parameter set was found to provide a reliable and stable performance across all tested lens-camera systems, demonstrating the method's versatility and strong practical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.