ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Concurrent Validity of Two Inertial Measurement Unit Pipelines for Estimating Lumbar and Thoracic Kinematics During Lifting Tasks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lumbosacral and thoracolumbar kinematics are key risk factors for lifting-related low back pain, yet their measurement is typically restricted to motion capture laboratories. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the potential to quantify spine kinematics in more naturalistic settings, but the validity of IMU-based processing pipelines relative to optical motion capture (OMC) remains unclear. Nine healthy participants performed stoop, squat, free, and asymmetric lifting tasks while IMU and OMC data were simultaneously collected to evaluate the concurrent validity of two IMU pipelines: the proprietary MVN Analyze pipeline and an OpenSense pipeline using a validated OpenSim biomechanical model for lifting. Joint angles from both pipelines were compared against OMC-derived joint angles calculated using the same validated OpenSim model with one-way repeated-measures statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.