Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122326›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

PhysioKey: Edge-AI-Driven Physiological Key Agreement for Secure Body Area Networks.

Mohammed Alnemari, Osamah M Al-Omair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammed AlnemariDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5971-6703
Osamah M Al-OmairDepartment of Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-9990

Funding

King Faisal University grant KFU261950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body area networks (BANs) require secure intra-body communication, yet sensor nodes are too resource-constrained for conventional public-key cryptography, and pre-shared key schemes conflict with plug-and-play clinical workflows. This paper introduces PhysioKey, a TinyML-based key agreement framework that derives symmetric session keys from physiological signals without pre-shared secrets or trusted third parties. A lightweight 1D-CNN (6320 parameters, INT8-quantized, 31.2 KB flash) extracts embeddings from ECG and PPG windows on ARM Cortex-M4 class devices, which are reconciled through fuzzy commitment with BCH error-correcting codes. Patient-level 5-fold cross-validation on PTB-XL (500 patients, dual-ECG) achieves EER of 7.8%±0.8% with ROC AUC 0.978±0.004; on BIDMC (53 patients, ECG + PPG), a dual-encoder architecture reduces cross-modal EER to 30.6%±1.2%. Since standalone PhysioKey yields only 7-24 effective key bits, the recommended deployment mode is a hybrid PhysioKey + ECDH protocol providing 128-bit security while PhysioKey adds physical on-body authentication; standalone operation suits energy-constrained scenarios with its 27× advantage over ECDH. HKDF-SHA-256 post-processing yields session keys passing all six NIST SP 800-22 tests (≥96% at the 1024-bit level).

Indexed as

Computer SecurityAlgorithmsComputer Communication NetworksElectrocardiographyHumansSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedbody area networkECGedge AIfuzzy commitmenthealthcare IoT securityphysiological key agreementPPGTinyML

Identifiers

PMID42122326
PMCPMC13165989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.