ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ultrathin Temporary Tattoo Electrodes Enable Prolonged Skin-Conformable EMG Sensing for Hip Exoskeleton Control.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional gel electrodes are the gold standard for surface electromyography (sEMG), yet their bulkiness, stiffness, and limited gel lifetime prevents seamless day-long integration with wearable robots. We integrated ultrathin skin-conformal temporary tattoo electrodes with a powered unilateral hip exoskeleton and compared signal quality during treadmill walking against gel. In this pilot study, five healthy participants completed three consecutive walking blocks at fixed speed: (1) using gel electrodes; (2) using tattoo electrodes to compare signal quality; and (3) using the same tattoo electrodes (not repositioned) after eight hours of wear to simulate a full day of typical device use and to evaluate potential degradation in signal quality over time. Electrodes were positioned on muscles not covered by the exoskeleton interface (tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis), as well as on muscles located beneath the exoskeleton cuff, which were potentially subject to motion artifacts due to the application of external forces by the exoskeleton (rectus femoris and biceps femoris, BF). Across all muscles, for both gel and tattoo electrodes, the root mean square error (RMSE) between normalized sEMG envelopes and biological activation profile was 0.069 ± 0.048, and Pearson's correlation coefficient (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.