Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122304›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Oracle Upper Bounds on Clean-EEG Recoverability from Single-Channel Decompositions Under EOG/EMG Contamination.

Usman Qamar Shaikh, Anubha Manju Kalra, Andrew Lowe, Imran Khan Niazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Usman Qamar ShaikhInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0000-0171-3940
Anubha Manju KalraInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7908-3053
Andrew LoweInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0612-1036
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSingle-channel EEG artifact suppression often relies on signal decomposition; however, it is not always clear how much clean EEG is recoverable from a given decomposition when component weighting is ideal. We present an oracle-based benchmark that characterises this best-case recoverability across common 1-D decomposition families under controlled EOG, EMG, and mixed contamination. This work does not propose a new denoising algorithm; rather, it isolates representation capacity from component-selection heuristics by computing an upper bound on reconstruction quality. APPROACH: Using EEGdenoiseNet, we constructed a synthetic benchmark of 4500 single-channel 2 s segments (125 Hz; T = 250) by mixing clean EEG with ocular (EOG) and/or cranial EMG exemplars at noise-to-signal ratios (NSRs) spanning -10 to +10 dB (floor -10 dB denotes an absent modality). We evaluated variational mode decomposition (VMD), singular spectrum analysis (SSA), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), and CEEMDAN by decomposing each mixture and reconstructing the clean EEG using a bounded nonnegative linear combination of components obtained via constrained least squares (the oracle). MAIN

resultsUnder this oracle benchmark, SSA achieved the lowest reconstruction error in most tested conditions, while DWT tended to rank best in milder ocular regimes; VMD performance improved, with an increased mode count at higher computational cost. CEEMDAN exhibited higher latency dominated by ensemble settings. SIGNIFICANCE: These results should be interpreted as decomposition-level upper bounds under controlled mixtures, not field-ready denoising performance. The benchmark provides a tool with which to compare representational recoverability across decompositions and to inform the subsequent design of practical component-selection strategies.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyElectromyographyElectrooculographyAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioWavelet Analysisartifact suppressionCEEMDANelectroencephalography (EEG)muscle artifacts (EMG)ocular artifacts (EOG)signal decompositionsingular spectrum analysis (SSA)variational mode decomposition (VMD)wavelet transform (DWT)

Identifiers

PMID42122304
PMCPMC13165893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.