ReviewCancers2026
HDR Endorectal/Endoluminal Brachytherapy Boost in Rectal Organ Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07786493 (A Prospective Single-Arm Phase II Study of Pelvic External Beam Radiotherapy Followed by HDR Endorectal Brachytherapy Combined With a 3D-Printed Individualized Guide Template and Tungsten-Alloy Local Shielding for Organ Preservation in Inoperable Localized Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Single-Arm Phase II Study of Pelvic External Beam Radiotherapy Followed by HDR Endorectal Brachytherapy Combined With a 3D-Printed Individualized Guide Template and Tungsten-Alloy Local Shielding for Organ Preservation in Inoperable Localized Rectal Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeOrgan-preservation strategies are increasingly being incorporated into rectal cancer management, but the role of HDR endorectal/endoluminal brachytherapy boost remains less well defined than that of broader non-operative treatment pathways. Existing literature is frequently mixed with contact X-ray brachytherapy series, neoadjuvant protocols with planned surgery, or heterogeneous watch-and-wait cohorts, limiting the interpretation of this specific strategy. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating definitive-intent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without chemotherapy, followed by HDR endorectal/endoluminal brachytherapy boost in histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma managed without planned surgery. Pooled analyses were performed for clinical complete response (cCR) and late grade ≥3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Regrowth/local failure outcomes were synthesized descriptively because of heterogeneity in endpoint definitions, denominator selection, and follow-up structure.
resultsSix studies were included in the quantitative evidence base, with one additional small feasibility report summarized narratively. The pooled cCR proportion was 69.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.7-86.6). The pooled proportion of late grade ≥3 GI toxicity was 18.1% (95% CI, 10.9-28.6). Reported regrowth/local failure outcomes were not suitable for formal pooling because of inconsistent definitions, differing denominator structures, and non-uniform follow-up frameworks across studies.
conclusionCurrent evidence suggests that EBRT plus HDR endorectal/endoluminal brachytherapy boost may represent a selective organ-preservation strategy for carefully chosen patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, particularly where surgery is not feasible or not desired. Its broader clinical use remains limited not only by the small size of the evidence base, but also by fragmented endpoint definitions, inconsistent denominator reporting, and insufficiently standardized durable local-control outcomes. These findings support cautious interpretation of the current evidence and highlight priorities for future prospective studies in rectal cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.