Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122246›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer After Liver Transplant for Isolated Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Narrative Review.

Rishav Agrawal, Anthony J Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rishav AgrawalDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1438-5135
Anthony J ChoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4900-1202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transplant can significantly improve survival in patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) not amenable to surgical resection. The use of evolving strict selection criteria to identify patients with CRLM best suited for transplant has greatly prolonged disease-free survival and resulted in a post-transplant overall survival similar to that of other established indications for transplant such as advanced cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. While recurrence of colorectal cancer is still seen in the majority of patients after transplant, lesions are typically slow-growing and treatable without significant mortality. Further profiling of patients' tumor molecular and biologic activity before transplant can help risk-stratify them for aggressive recurrence. Our current understanding of recurrence after liver transplant for CRLM is based on only a small number of prospective studies but further trials are underway. Novel surgical approaches which could expand the pool of patients eligible for transplant are also being evaluated. We summarize and discuss the current state of the literature describing the patterns, risk factors, and treatment of recurrence after liver transplant for isolated CRLM.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercolorectal liver metastasesliver transplantrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID42122246
PMCPMC13163008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.