Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122244›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Bispecific Antibodies and Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Jane E Rogers, Jaffer A Ajani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jane E RogersDepartment of Pharmacy Clinical Services, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7275-7008
Jaffer A AjaniDepartment of Gastrointesintal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced gastric (GAC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJAC) adenocarcinoma continues to carry a poor prognosis. Understanding GAC/GEJAC at the molecular level has provided a new understanding and the basis for individualized approaches to treatment. The current biomarker-driven therapy focuses on four areas: microsatellite instability (MSI), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) combined positive score, and claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2). However, because of improving technology, the focus has shifted to cancer cell-surface proteins and peptides. Each of these GAC/GEJAC subgroups provides a different treatment pathway. The agents utilized to treat advanced GAC/GEJAC include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chemotherapy, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy, as well as bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), but they are certainly not limited to the above. Drug development has shifted in recent years to establish different mechanisms that are attempting more sophisticated and targeted approaches, such as BsAbs and ADCs. Meanwhile, the development of cytotoxics has tapered off. Along with these developments in drug therapy, more therapies directed at CLDN18.2, HER2, MSI, EGFR, HER3 and trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) are underway. Here we review future areas in advanced GAC, including zanidatamab's potential role in HER2-positive advanced GAC and deciphering the abundance of anti-CLDN18.2, extending beyond investigative therapies.

Indexed as

claudin 18.2gastric adenocarcinomagastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomahuman epidermal growth factor receptor-2microsatellite instability-hightrophoblast cell-surface antigen 2zanidatamab

Identifiers

PMID42122244
PMCPMC13162944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.