ReviewCancers2026
STAS More than a Prognostic Marker-An Evolving Factor in Operative and Adjuvant Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage NSCLC.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) was first described over a decade ago, numerous studies have demonstrated that it is a high-risk prognostic feature in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, due to preoperative and intraoperative limitations in pathologic diagnosis, STAS is generally diagnosed following curative intent resection. While STAS should influence NSCLC treatment strategy-particularly upfront surgical decision-making-postoperative diagnosis of STAS has heretofore limited this possibility. While limited to retrospective studies, the current evidence suggests that patients with tumor STAS should undergo a more extensive anatomical resection-preferably a lobectomy, if they are candidates. These results are particularly important in the setting of the results of the JCOG0802 and CALGB 140503 randomized controlled trials which have begun a paradigm-shift toward sublobar resections for early-stage NSCLC, which may not hold similar benefit for early-stage STAS+ disease. The aims of this review are to: (1) detail the current evidence concerning choice of resection extent for STAS+ disease, (2) summarize the current evidence about optimum surgical margins for STAS+ disease, (3) detail the potential role for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage STAS+ disease, (4) assess the current limitations in preoperative STAS risk prediction and intraoperative STAS detection, and (5) highlight promising AI-based advancements which will allow surgeons to risk-stratify STAS probability or confirm STAS status intraoperatively. The main limitation of this review is the reliance on retrospective studies as there is a current lack of prospective or randomized data within STAS+ NSCLC, particularly regarding optimal resection strategy for STAS+ disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.