Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122214›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Advances, Challenges, and Emerging Strategies.

Kyle Taing, Keeyon Dabirian, Aditya Shreenivas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle TaingDepartment of Internal Medicine, Huntington Hospital, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA.
Keeyon DabirianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Huntington Hospital, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA.
Aditya ShreenivasDepartment of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-1523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies-which comprise esophageal, gastric, colorectal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers-remain a leading global cause of oncologic morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for many patients (especially those diagnosed with advanced-stage disease) remains poor despite conventional therapies-namely, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Immunotherapy, however, has emerged as a new strategy in oncology, and, in particular, the advent of cancer vaccines now provides an investigational approach to improving clinical outcomes in patients with GI malignancies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of multiple vaccine-based strategies developed to better target GI cancers, spanning from early preclinical studies to the most recently completed clinical trials. We first introduce the main vaccine therapy classes and the immunologic rationale underlying each. We then summarize key findings from past and ongoing trials using a cancer-type-based approach, primarily focusing on vaccine safety and immunogenicity, and commenting on limitations in overall efficacy. Finally, we identify the challenges of applying mostly early-phase trials to clinical practice as well as future directions for integrating these vaccine-based approaches into personalized treatments for GI cancer patients.

Indexed as

cancer vaccinesimmune checkpoint inhibitorsneoantigenspersonalized vaccinestumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42122214
PMCPMC13163029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.