ReviewCancers2026
Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) in Cancer: Functional Programs, Metastatic Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Targeting.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tissue-Resident Macrophage in Inflammation and Cancer.MedComm · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are among the most abundant immune cell populations in breast cancer and have emerged as central regulators of tumor progression, metastatic dissemination, immune evasion, and therapeutic resistance. While TAMs were historically described using a simplified M1/M2 polarization framework, accumulating evidence indicates that TAMs in breast cancer comprise a continuum of phenotypic and functional states shaped by ontogeny (tissue-resident vs monocyte-derived), spatial localization (including hypoxic, perivascular, and invasive niches), tumor-intrinsic programs, and therapy-induced selective pressures. In breast cancer, mechanistic studies integrating lineage tracing, intravital imaging, single-cell and spatial profiling, and clinical analyses have established that TAMs actively coordinate rate-limiting steps of the metastatic cascade. These include promotion of angiogenesis and vascular permeability, orchestration of tumor cell invasion and TMEM-mediated intravasation, facilitation of metastatic seeding and niche formation, and suppression of anti-tumor immunity. TAMs also critically influence therapeutic response by modulating chemotherapy efficacy and limiting the activity of immune checkpoint blockade. Therapeutic strategies targeting TAMs in breast cancer have evolved from depletion approaches (CSF1/CSF1R blockade) to inhibition of monocyte recruitment (CCL2/CCR2 axis), functional reprogramming (CD40 agonism, PI3Kγ inhibition), and macrophage-directed checkpoint modulation (CD47-SIRPα axis). Early clinical studies demonstrate clear pharmacodynamic activity but highlight the need for context-specific and combination-based approaches. This review focuses on TAM biology in breast cancer progression and metastasis, synthesizing key mechanistic and translational evidence and proposing a framework in which spatially and functionally defined macrophage states act as rate-limiting regulators of dissemination and therapy response. We further outline principles for rational TAM-targeting strategies that integrate tumor stage, metastatic niche, and treatment context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.