ReviewCancers2026
PD-L1-Guided Chemo-Immunotherapy in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Survival Benefits and Toxicity Profiles.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high tumor mutation burden and frequent programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, making immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) a promising therapeutic approach. However, randomized trials of chemoimmunotherapy (Chemo-IO) in locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC have shown inconsistent results, necessitating a clearer understanding of efficacy and patient selection.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and to identify beneficiary populations to guide optimal treatment selection. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception through 23 August 2025. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy combined with ICIs vs. chemotherapy with placebo or control in patients with locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators independently performed data extraction and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool (RoB 2). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I
resultsSeven RCTs comprising 3485 patients (2085 in the Chemo-IO group, 1400 in the control group) were included. The median age across trials ranged from 52 to 57 years. Chemo-IO significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.89]; CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with locally recurrent unresectable or metastatic TNBC, without substantially increasing chemotherapy-related toxicities. However, the OS benefit in PD-L1-positive patients was not statistically significant, and the combined regimen was associated with higher rates of serious and immune-related adverse events. These findings support the use of Chemo-IO as a treatment option, highlighting the importance of PD-L1 status and careful monitoring of immune-mediated toxicities in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.