Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122059›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Neurodevelopmental Trajectories in Preterm Neonates: Integrating Neuroimaging Modalities with Clinical Neurological Outcomes.

Andreea Ioana Necula, Roxana Pavalache-Stoiciu, Larisa Nicoleta Andrasoaie, Al Jashi Isam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreea Ioana NeculaDoctoral School, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020956 Bucharest, Romania.
Roxana Pavalache-StoiciuDepartment of Neonatology, MedLife Medical Park, 013695 Bucharest, Romania.
Larisa Nicoleta AndrasoaieDepartment of Neonatology, MedLife Medical Park, 013695 Bucharest, Romania.
Al Jashi IsamFaculty of Medicine, University Titu Maiorescu, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review aims to demonstrate how integrating neuroimaging with functional assessments and standardized protocols enhances the identification of long-term motor and psychiatric risks. This review synthesized 12 studies from the last 5 years. The analysis focused on preterm infants (<37 weeks' gestational age) and evaluated the correlation between neuroimaging (head ultrasound (HUS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)), head circumference (HC), and functional assessments like Prechtl General Movements (GMs). While HUS remains the primary bedside tool, its sensitivity for subtle, non-cystic white matter injury is limited compared to MRI. Both modalities demonstrate high negative predictive values at term-equivalent age (TEA) for excluding severe motor deficits. Structural markers, including increased ventricular midbody size, immature gyration, and bilateral lesion laterality, were strongly associated with Cerebral Palsy (CP) and gross motor delays. Furthermore, TEA assessments provided superior prognostic accuracy compared to early neonatal scans. Optimal outcomes were linked to the integration of neuroimaging with functional assessments (GMs) and reliable parental support to ensure follow-up compliance. A tiered HUS/MRI protocol combined with routine GMs assessment enables precise prognostic counseling. Correlating TEA imaging with long-term findings necessitates follow-up beyond 24 months.

Indexed as

General Movementshead ultrasoundMRIneurodevelopmentpreterm

Identifiers

PMID42122059
PMCPMC13164221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.