Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42122019›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

High-Frequency Miniprobe Endoscopic Ultrasonography Across the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Francesco Bombaci, Angelo Bruni, Margherita Pavanato, Giuseppe Dell'Anna, Francesco Vito Mandarino, Giulio Calabrese, Andrea Lisotti, Pietro Fusaroli, Leonardo Henry Eusebi, Giovanni Barbara and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco BombaciDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Angelo BruniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0895-1225
Margherita PavanatoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe Dell'AnnaGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-5468
Francesco Vito MandarinoGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-7221
Giulio CalabreseGastroenterology Unit, San Pio Hospital, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Andrea LisottiGastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, 40026 Imola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-7402
Pietro FusaroliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-9314
Leonardo Henry EusebiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-7744
Giovanni BarbaraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Paolo CecinatoGastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1870-5952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miniprobe endoscopic ultrasonography (mEUS) combines high-resolution imaging of the gastrointestinal (GI) wall and bile ducts with ease of applicability during routine endoscopy. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of known and emerging fields of application for mEUS in gastrointestinal endoscopy. After its initial development in pancreatobiliary scenarios in the early 1990s, mEUS has been recently reconsidered a third-space endoscopic technique that is progressively developing and spreading for the treatment of early gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions. The high spatial resolution of mEUS provides an accurate assessment of the degree of submucosal invasion in early esophageal, gastric, and colorectal neoplasia, while the small caliber of catheters allows for mEUS employment in settings where standard echoendoscopes are impractical (e.g., severe stenoses or proximal colonic lesions). Beyond cancer staging, mEUS offers point-of-care characterization of subepithelial lesions by defining the layer of origin and echo-pattern, eventually defining endoscopic resectability, but definitive diagnosis remains histological. In pancreatobiliary diseases, miniprobe intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) shows its strongest application for indeterminate biliary strictures when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based sampling strategies and brushing cytology show inconclusive diagnoses, and in choledocholithiasis, particularly for the detection of small stones/sludge and confirmation of duct clearance. IDUS is also valuable for the staging of ampullary tumors, for longitudinal extension mapping in hilar cholangiocarcinoma and for selected portal biliopathy scenarios. Overall, mEUS and IDUS are high-resolution adjuncts that can meaningfully refine local decision-making in the treatment of superficial epithelial/subepithelial tumors or lesions involving the bile ducts. Limitations include shallow penetration, lack of tissue acquisition capability, a relative increase in post-ERCP pancreatitis risk for intraductal use, and substantial cost with limited availability in lower-volume centers.

Indexed as

endoscopy ultrasonographyhigh-frequency ultrasound catheter probesintraductal ultrasonographyminiprobe endoscopic ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42122019
PMCPMC13163068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.