ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Biomarker-Based Diagnosis and Risk Stratification in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: From Molecular Mechanisms to Multimarker Panels.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) remains a major diagnostic challenge in critically ill patients, as conventional functional criteria-serum creatinine and urine output-often detect AKI after clinically relevant pathophysiological derangement has already evolved. Increasing evidence suggests that SA-AKI reflects a heterogeneous process characterized by early cellular stress, microcirculatory dysfunction, inflammation-associated injury, and maladaptive repair preceding overt functional decline. In this context, biomarker-based approaches have been investigated to improve early risk stratification, phenotypic characterization, and prognostic assessment in septic patients. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on established and emerging biomarkers relevant to SA-AKI, encompassing stress markers ([TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]), tubular injury markers (e.g., NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18), functional markers (e.g., proenkephalin/penKid, cystatin C), and exploratory molecular signatures such as circulating microRNAs (miRNAs). We examine their temporal dynamics, performance estimates, and context-dependent applicability in sepsis, and discuss limitations related to heterogeneity, assay variability, and threshold standardization. Particular attention is given to multimodal and longitudinal strategies integrating biomarkers with KDIGO criteria and clinical phenotyping. Finally, we outline a stratified framework for biomarker interpretation in SA-AKI anchored to pathophysiological windows and clinical decision points. While available evidence supports the potential of selected biomarkers for short-term risk stratification and trajectory assessment, implementation requires prospective validation demonstrating incremental value beyond established models and measurable impact on patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.