ReviewCells2026
Microglia Reprogramming in Glioblastoma: Stem Cell-Derived Factors as Emerging Immunomodulators.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most challenging forms of cancer to treat, despite that extensive molecular profiling is now available. Indeed, intratumoral cellular heterogeneity, receptor redundancy, and adaptive resistance through compensatory signaling limit the impact of targeted therapies. Moreover, immunotherapies also underperform: checkpoint blockade and vaccine strategies did not obtain consistent benefits in a low mutational burden, poorly immunogenic tumor microenvironment (TME) dominated by immunosuppressive myeloid cells. In this article, we provide evidence that tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), a form of CNS resident microglia and infiltrating macrophage, derived from bone marrow, adopt a spatially and transcriptionally distinct, non-binary continuum, shaped by tumor-derived signals and niche constraints, allowing glioma cells to resist to immune and pharmaceutical therapeutics. Metabolic rewiring, including hypoxia-linked glycolytic pressure, lactate signaling, and lipid-associated programs, determine immunosuppressive outputs and restrict plasticity, while epigenetic imprinting (DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin regulators) stabilizes these programs and limits access to inflammatory loci. We discuss how stem cell secretome, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) and their cargo may act as tunable autocrine/paracrine inputs that may bias microglial regulatory control. Finally, we highlight major translational confounders, including EV operational definitions, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and regional exposure, inconsistent dosing units, mixed myeloid compartments, and manufacturing dependent variability. Therefore, an exposure-aware framework that integrates product identity, delivery evidence, state-sensitive potency assays, and functional endpoints would be highly desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.