ReviewCells2026
The Current Landscape of Adult Neural Stem Cell Research: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adult neural stem cells (NSCs) maintain lifelong neurogenesis, a fundamental process for neuroplasticity, memory and brain homeostasis. Despite decades of research, translating basic NSC biology into effective clinical therapies remains a central challenge. Here we present a narrative review that provides a comprehensive update on the current landscape of adult NSC research, associating molecular mechanisms with the emerging translational technologies. First, we analyze the biological features and neurogenic sequences within canonical niches such as the subventricular lateral zone and the subgranular zone, emphasizing phylogenetic and migratory differences between rodent models and humans. Second, we integrate these mechanisms with the influence of environmental and pathological modulators, describing how aging, metabolic changes, chronic stress and neuroinflammation disrupt NSC quiescence and lineage progression. Finally, we highlight recent technological advances driving the field toward clinical applications. By examining current NSC isolation strategies, induced pluripotent stem cell modeling, direct somatic reprogramming and the use of CRISPR-Cas9-based gene-editing therapies, this review delineates the pathways to overcome existing methodological limitations. Ultimately, we provide an integrated context that connects the modulation of the neurogenic niches with advanced in vitro technologies, offering new perspectives for regenerative medicine and the treatment of neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.