ReviewCells2026
From Histology to Multi-Omics: Review of Chordoma Classification and Its Clinical Implications.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chordoma is a rare malignant neoplasm of the axial skeleton, arising from notochordal remnants. No approved systemic therapies exist, and the 10-year overall survival is below 60%. Accurate molecular and pathological classification is a prerequisite for improved prognostication and the identification of actionable therapeutic targets; however, molecular classification of chordoma remains significantly less advanced than that of other neoplasms. This narrative review synthesizes proposed classification frameworks for chordoma across histological, radiological, surgical, genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic domains. PubMed and CENTRAL were searched on 1 February 2026 using five queries: 'chordoma classification', 'chordoma DNA sequencing', 'chordoma RNA sequencing', 'chordoma methylation', and 'chordoma copy number'. Original research articles describing more than one patient and reporting a classification or subtyping framework were included; review articles, case reports, and non-English publications were excluded. Sample size and the use of a validation dataset were identified for each study. Results were synthesized qualitatively. A total of 108 studies encompassing 6349 individuals were included. Across six domains, four cross-cutting themes with prognostic and potential theranostic value emerged: copy number alterations, particularly
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.