ArticleCells2026
Successful In Vitro Modification of the
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prime Editing Mediated Generation and Correction of the mdx5cv Mutation Restores Dystrophin Expression in Myoblasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal X-linked neuromuscular disorder caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. Prime editing is a versatile genome editing technology capable of introducing precise nucleotide changes without generating double-strand DNA breaks, making it a promising approach for correcting pathogenic point mutations. In this study, we applied prime editing to modify mdx-4cv and mdx-5cv mutation-equivalent sites in mouse C2C12 myoblasts in vitro. Initial editing efficiencies were unexpectedly low and were associated with the presence of a 5'-TTCT-3' motif within engineered prime editing guide RNAs (epegRNAs). epegRNA designs containing this motif exhibited reduced prime editing efficiency, whereas silent substitution eliminating the motif significantly improved editing outcomes, indicating that specific sequence features within epegRNAs can influence editing performance. Rational redesign of epegRNAs to remove this motif substantially enhanced editing efficiency, achieving up to 20% modification at the 4cv target site using an NGG PAM and 21% editing at the 5cv locus using an NGAG PAM. These findings highlight an important sequence-dependent constraint in epegRNA design and provide practical guidance for optimizing prime editing strategies targeting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.