ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Circles of Connection: Visualizing Human-Nature-Animal Bonds Through Participatory Art in Wildlife Tourism.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding human-nature-animal relationships is central to conservation and visitor management, yet these relationships are commonly studied through language-based surveys that may exclude participants across age groups and diverse cultural or educational backgrounds. This limitation highlights the need for more inclusive and experience-sensitive approaches capable of capturing relational meanings beyond verbal expression. This study adopts a visual participatory approach in which volunteer tourists were invited to draw circles representing themselves in relation to images of a giant panda, nature, and a pet. Extending the visual idea of Schultz's Inclusion of Nature in Self in the Connection to Nature Index, more than 1000 tourists at the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding produced over 3000 drawings. These drawings were systematically coded along three dimensions-circle size, orientation, and spatial relationship-and analyzed using multinomial logistic regression and non-parametric tests. The results reveal consistent yet differentiated patterns of visual representation. Participants most frequently expressed relationships with nature and pets through enclosing circles, suggesting spatial inclusion, whereas relationships with the giant panda were more often represented through separate but proximal positioning, indicating a more mediated or observational mode of connection. Demographic factors, including age, residence, and visitation stage, significantly influenced drawing configurations, supporting the interpretation of connection as a context-sensitive and dynamic process rather than a fixed individual trait. Associations between drawing dimensions and self-reported pro-environmental orientation and momentary well-being were observed, although these relationships should be interpreted cautiously given the use of brief, context-specific indicators. Overall, the findings demonstrate that participatory drawing can function as both a research instrument and an engagement tool, enabling diverse visitor groups-including children-to express relational understandings of nature and wildlife. For conservation practice, such visual methods offer a scalable and low-barrier approach to visitor engagement, with potential applications in environmental education, interpretation design, and the assessment of human-animal relationships in situ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.