ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bridging the Knowledge-Practice Gap in Cervical Spine Injury First Aid: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Saudi Arabia.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCervical spine injuries (CSIs) are life-threatening conditions commonly resulting from road traffic accidents and falls; improper first aid management can significantly worsen neurological outcomes. Public awareness and correct first aid response are critical for preventing secondary injury; despite this, available data from the southern provinces of Saudi Arabia remain insufficient. This study aimed to assess public awareness and first aid preparedness for CSIs across four southern regions of Saudi Arabia.
methodsA cross-sectional design was employed across multiple regions, encompassing 1179 adults from Jazan, Aseer, Al-Baha, and Najran between 2025 and 2026. A validated online questionnaire was employed for data collection to assess CSI awareness, recognition of injury signs, and appropriate first aid responses. Awareness scores of ≥60% were classified as good. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of awareness.
resultsThe mean awareness score was 16.0 ± 4.8 out of a possible total of 20 points, corresponding to 80% of the total score, with 87% of participants demonstrating good awareness. The majority of respondents recognized the importance of spinal immobilization (89%), maintaining head-neck alignment (95%), and contacting emergency services before intervention (93%). Correct responses to emergency scenarios were recorded in 83% of participants. Notably, only 39% had attended formal medical or trauma training, and merely 3% reported real-life first aid experience. Training attendance (β = 1.39,
conclusionsAlthough general public awareness of CSI first aid is high, formal training participation remains critically low, revealing a substantial gap between knowledge and practice. Integrating structured first aid training into community, workplace, and primary healthcare settings is essential to improve trauma outcomes and reduce preventable disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.