ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study Applying EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, and LARS Score at 1-6 Months Postoperatively.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesQuality of life (QoL) and functional recovery are essential outcomes in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery. In addition to oncological results, bowel dysfunction and stoma-related issues may significantly affect postoperative well-being. We aimed to evaluate QoL changes at 1 and 6 months postoperatively and functional outcomes in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgical treatment, sphincter-preserving surgeries (SPS) or abdominoperineal resection (APR). Owing to its impact on QoL, several functions were assessed using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score.
methodsThis retrospective observational study consisted of 99 patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery, of which 38 patients had colostomy, and 61 no colostomy. To assess patient-reported outcomes related to QoL, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, QLQ-CR29 questionnaire, and LARS instrument were sent to the patients at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Changes over time were analyzed using paired statistical tests, and subgroup analyses were performed according to colostomy status and surgical approach.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed in the global health status and all major functional domains between 1 and 6 months postoperatively. The global health status increased from 74.9% to 86.5% (
conclusionsIn this study, QoL and bowel function improved significantly during the first 6 months after colorectal cancer surgery. Although most patients demonstrated recovery, persistent bowel dysfunction and stoma-related challenges remain important issues. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive postoperative care and routine assessment of both QoL and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.