ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evaluating the Effect of Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP) Reform in China on Hospitalization Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Special Reference to M City.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-magnification inpatient cases under DIP payment reform: prevalence, cost burden, and risk factors in an NHC-administered hospital in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) poses a substantial public health challenge in China owing to its increasing prevalence and substantial economic burden. In response, the diagnosis-intervention packet (DIP) payment reform was implemented to control healthcare costs and enhance service efficiency.
methodsTo evaluate the effect of the DIP reform on medical costs, hospitalization days, and individual out-of-pocket payments for COPD inpatients in M City, a pilot city in central China, we conducted an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis using monthly reimbursement records from January 2020 to December 2023. The study included 84,410 hospitalized patients from a city-wide database of 3,241,233 inpatient records with COPD who met the inclusion criteria. The analysis focused on the total healthcare costs, length of stay, and individual out-of-pocket costs.
resultsThe DIP reform resulted in a 3.7% reduction (95% CI: 0.9% to 6.5%) in the total hospitalization costs in the first month post-reform, with a sustained monthly decline of 0.8% (95% CI: 0.5% to 1.1%). The length of stay decreased from 9.53 (95% CI: 9.31 to 9.75) to 8.74 days (95% CI: 8.62 to 8.86). Conversely, the proportion of out-of-pocket payments relative to total costs increased.
conclusionsWhile the DIP reform effectively reduced hospitalization costs and days, it led to an increase in individual out-of-pocket payments. Future research should focus on optimizing payment rules, enhancing the supervision of medical services, and refining health insurance policies to achieve the reform's objectives better and alleviate the financial burden on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.