Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121553›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Environmental Evaluation in Bakery and Brewing Sectors in a Circular Economy Context.

Ionică Drăgan, Emilie Korbel, Gaelle Petit, Lynda Aissani, Vanessa Jury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ionică DrăganOniris, GEPEA, UMR6144, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0009-0001-3899-2426
Emilie KorbelOniris, GEPEA, UMR6144, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6192-1976
Gaelle PetitIRSTV-Institut de Recherche en Sciences et Techniques de la Ville, FR CNRS 2488, CEDEX 3, 44321 Nantes, France.
Lynda AissaniIRSTV-Institut de Recherche en Sciences et Techniques de la Ville, FR CNRS 2488, CEDEX 3, 44321 Nantes, France.
Vanessa JuryOniris, GEPEA, UMR6144, 44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8306-0097

Funding

IRSTV-Institute for Research in Urban Science and Technology FR CNRS 2488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring sustainable food production for a growing population requires robust tools like the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), despite the fundamental complexities characterising the agri-food sector. This study evaluates the environmental impacts of beer and bread production, two important sectors, within a circular economy framework using the LCA. The analysis focuses on innovative products: bread incorporating brewery-spent grain and beer brewed from unsold bread. The study follows a cradle-to-gate approach, covering the entire upstream supply chain, including cultivation, milling, malting, and ingredient production. Cultivation emerges as the primary environmental hotspot in both systems. In bread production, the bakery and proofing phases also show high impacts, while in brewing, packaging is the dominant contributor, followed by boiling and hopping. For co-product processing, drying and transport are critical hotspots. Compared with conventional products, innovative circular products generally show lower environmental impacts, with exceptions related to organic cultivation and allocation constraints. Circular strategies notably reduce land use and marine eutrophication in most organic cases. Overall, the fully circular scenario outperforms the Conventional System in 13 impact categories, supporting the environmental potential of circular approaches in both sectors.

Indexed as

beerbreadlife cycle assessmentlife cycle thinkingsustainable agri-food chainsupcycling

Identifiers

PMID42121553
PMCPMC13163583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.