ArticlePest management science2026
Effects of pupal hypoxia duration and holding temperature on quality control parameters of sterile Queensland fruit fly.
Article in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe sterile insect technique is used to eradicate outbreaks of Queensland fruit fly (Q-fly) Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) in fruit-fly-free regions of Australia and shows promise for suppression in endemic areas. Prior to irradiation, pupae are sealed in plastic bags to induce hypoxia, reducing oxidative stress and delaying adult emergence. After irradiation, pupae are transported to rear-out centers under continued hypoxia. Previous studies reported only modest reductions in adult emergence following hypoxia. Here, we assessed the effects of hypoxia duration and temperature on multiple quality parameters. Pupae were stored under hypoxia for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 days at 18 and 25 °C. In addition to standard quality control parameters (emergence rate, longevity and flight ability), a locomotor activity monitor was used to assess pre-emergence period, survival, and locomotor activity under nutritional stress.
resultsPre-emergence period and survival under nutritional stress was not affected by hypoxia duration or temperature. However, number of fly movements per hour under nutritional stress were reduced after 4 days of hypoxia. Adult emergence and flight ability were unaffected up to 2 days of hypoxia but declined sharply after 4 days or longer, with stronger effects at 25 °C. The percentage of partial emergence and deformed adults also increased significantly after 4 days.
conclusionQ-fly pupae can safely endure hypoxia for up to 2 days, with storage at 18 °C recommended for longer durations to minimize impacts on emergence and flight ability. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.