Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121348›Full record

ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026

Safety and Tolerability of Fractional CO

Ayooluwatomiwa I Oloruntoba, Michelle Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayooluwatomiwa I OloruntobaAlfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-9089
Michelle RodriguesUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-1882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFractional CO

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study of 38 patients (Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I-IV) treated with fractional CO

resultsMean pain score was 4.8, with no statistically significant difference between patients who received topical anesthetic (LMX4) and those who did not. Pain scores did not differ significantly across skin phototypes I-IV. Erythema occurred in 50% of patients and edema in 24%, all of which were transient. No cases of blistering, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, or scarring were documented in routine clinical records, although the true incidence may be underestimated. Erythema rates did not differ significantly by anesthetic use.

conclusionsIn this preliminary cohort, the HP fractional laser was associated with transient short-term adverse effects and no documented pigmentary complications among patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV. These findings are descriptive and are not generalizable to Fitzpatrick phototypes V-VI, which were not represented.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesLasers, GasRejuvenationSkin AgingAdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalEdemaErythemaFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID42121348
PMCPMC13168677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.