Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121318›Full record

ArticlePharmacotherapy2026

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intravenous Push Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis.

Susan E Smith, Rehana Bagodiya, Phuong Luong, Sakshi Shinde, Christopher M Bland, Christopher Barry, Michael G Bartlett, Nicholas R Fox, Trisha N Branan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susan E SmithDepartment of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-8405
Rehana BagodiyaDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Phuong LuongUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Sakshi ShindeDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Christopher M BlandDepartment of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Savannah, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8806-4583
Christopher BarryUniversity of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Michael G BartlettDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-3234
Nicholas R FoxAU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Trisha N BrananDepartment of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-7417

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
American College of Clinical PharmacyNIH National Institutes of Health UL1TR002378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravenous push (IVP) administration of cefepime increases ease of preparation and limits the need for small volume parenterals. The data on IVP pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters are limited, but may be especially relevant in critically ill patients with altered PK/PD for time-dependent antibiotics like cefepime. The objective of this study was to characterize the PK profile and PD target attainment of IVP cefepime in critically ill patients with sepsis.

methodsIn this institutional review board-approved, prospective, noninterventional PK study, hospitalized adult patients receiving IVP cefepime were included if they had a central/midline catheter, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay ≥ 48 h, creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min without renal replacement therapy, and diagnosis of sepsis. Blood samples were obtained at cefepime steady state immediately before and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min after a dose. Serum concentrations of cefepime were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected retrospectively from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was the PK profile of cefepime following IVP administration.

resultsPatients (n = 17) had a median age of 69 years, body mass index (BMI) of 29.9 kg/m

conclusionsIntravenous push cefepime in critically ill patients achieved systemic exposure comparable to traditional intermittent infusion but demonstrated substantial interpatient PK variability. These findings highlight the impact of critical illness on cefepime disposition and support further evaluation of personalized cefepime dosing for the ICU population.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeSepsisAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimecefepimecephalosporinscritical illnesspharmacokineticssepsis syndromes

Identifiers

PMID42121318
PMCPMC13168360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.