ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Chemoimmunotherapy With or Without Thoracic Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The optimal integration of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with first-line chemoimmunotherapy for elderly patients with driver-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains undefined. We conducted a real-world study to assess the efficacy and safety of this triple-modality therapy specifically in patients aged ≥ 65 years. We designed a retrospective analysis of elderly patients with stage IV, mutation-negative NSCLC who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy at our institution between November 2019 and September 2024. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were compared with the log-rank test. After a median follow-up of 22.34 months, the addition of TRT yielded numerically longer but statistically non-significant median PFS (12.20 vs. 10.17 months; p = 0.24) and OS (29.67 vs. 18.65 months; p = 0.09). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential survival trend with triple therapy in patients aged 65-70 years, whereas no benefit was observed in those aged ≥ 70 years. Notably, treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly more frequent in the Chemo+ICI+TRT group, with pneumonia being the predominant cause. For elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, particularly those aged ≥ 70 years, incorporating TRT into first-line chemoimmunotherapy did not significantly improve survival but substantially increased toxicity, often leading to treatment interruption. A potential benefit observed in patients aged 65-70 years requires prospective validation. These results highlight the critical need for personalized treatment intensity in geriatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.