Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121300›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026

"How do we want to be led?" Team aspirations and adaptive leadership in virtual and hybrid work.

Cass Coulston, Sukhi Shergill, Ricardo Twumasi, Myanna Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cass CoulstonKing's College, London. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9562-3045
Sukhi ShergillKing's College, London. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-9100
Ricardo TwumasiKing's College, London. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0194-7250
Myanna DuncanKing's College, London. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-6928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs virtual and hybrid work become embedded in organisational life,understanding how leadership can best support well-being and effective team functioning is vital. This study explores how leadership is experienced and enacted in virtual and hybrid teams, using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model as an interpretive framework and Conservation of Resources (COR) theory to deepen interpretation of strain and sustainability over time.

methodsQualitative data were gathered from thirty interviews with leaders and twenty-nine focus groups with team members (

resultsThree overarching themes were identified: "Connected Leadership Aspirations," "Leadership as a Positive Social Influence," and "The Leadership Tension." Findings highlighted a strong convergence between leaders' and team members' aspirations for relational, emotionally present leadership, while also revealing the strain leaders experienced in sustaining this form of leadership amid low visibility, emotional labour, and limited systemic support.

conclusionThis study extends understanding of leadership in virtual and hybrid teams by showing how leadership can be both supportive and demanding. Interpreted through JD-R and COR, the findings highlight the need for organisational systems and development approaches that adequately resource leadership demands to support well-being, connection, effective team functioning, and leadership sustainability.

Indexed as

LeadershipFocus GroupsGroup DynamicsHumansOrganizational CultureQualitative Researchhybrid teamsjob demands-resourcesleadership dynamicsteam well-beingVirtual teams

Identifiers

PMID42121300
PMCPMC13173572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.