SynthesisHuman resources for health2026
Factors associated with health care provider performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkers' health in business operations and healthcare delivery is paramount with various factors, significantly impacting performance and quality of care. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the intricate factors influencing the performance of healthcare providers.
methodsSearches were conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2024. A standardized form was used for data extraction of the characteristics of the studies, outcomes, and risk of bias. The identification and selection process is reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The meta-analysis was performed using Jamovi software (with major meta-analysis packages, version 2.4.14). The analysis was carried out using the Fisher r-to-z-transformed correlation coefficient as the outcome measure with a random-effects model fitted to the data.
resultsThe search strategy yielded 6136 studies from multiple databases, and according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, only 61 studies were eligible for qualitative synthesis and 37 for meta-analysis. Among these studies, there was a predominant focus on hospital settings, with 43 studies, and Asia had the most studies. A meta-analysis investigated the relationship of the associated factors that influence healthcare professionals' performance in a total sample size of 24,419. The estimated average correlation coefficient based on the random effects model was 0.2370 (95% CI 0.0745-0.3995). Training, stress, workload, and organizational culture were the most commonly mentioned factors influencing healthcare providers' performance.
conclusionThe relentless demands of healthcare can take a toll on providers' physical and mental health. Actionable intervention through organizational policies and procedures, continuous development programs, and supportive workplace environments can improve healthcare provider performance and ultimately improve the healthcare services. Performance can be preserved, improved, or optimized by improving these aspects that can positively impact the entire healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.