ArticleBMC health services research2026
End-of-life dementia: demographic, clinical as well as direct health care cost differences in nursing homes vs. ordinary housing.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn late stages, dementia is a palliative diagnosis and the majority of those affected are cared for in nursing homes, but some manage in ordinary housing. The aim was to study how these two groups differ as regards clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization and costs.
methodsA registry study (Region Stockholm) was performed on deceased patients (≥ 18 years) with a dementia diagnosis during their last year of life, for the years 2015-2023. Pairwise comparisons between nursing homes and ordinary housing were made and multivariable binary logistic regression models were created.
resultsPersons in ordinary housing were significantly younger (84 vs. 86 years old), more often male (51% vs. 39%), they had higher frailty risk scores (Hospital Frailty Risk Scores) and had more often a concomitant metastatic cancer (9% vs. 2%), p < 0.0001 in all comparisons. To meet the care needs, these persons received more often specialized palliative care, they had a higher use of geriatric services, they had more emergency room visits and died more often in emergency hospitals, p < 0.0001 in all comparisons. In contrast, those who were referred to nursing homes were more often women, older, they had more often Alzheimer´s disease (compared to other dementias), p < 0.0001 in all comparisons. As regards medical utilization, the associated costs were equally distributed between women and men in ordinary housing, whereas the costs were significantly higher for men compared with women in nursing homes.
conclusionsPersons with late-stage dementia in ordinary housing are more often younger, men and they have more often comorbidities, including cancer. They have significantly higher health care utilization, and the costs are equally distributed between women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.