Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026

Moving beyond good intentions: a qualitative study exploring healthcare professionals' perspectives on delivering equitable prenatal testing in the English NHS.

Michelle Peter, Clotilde Abe, Agnes Agyepong, Atinuke Awe, Rachael Buabeng, Morgan Daniel, Jane Fisher, Sasha Henriques, Kerry Leeson-Beevers, Lyn S Chitty and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michelle PeterNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 5, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK. michelle.peter@ucl.ac.uk.
Clotilde AbeFive x More, London, UK.
Agnes AgyepongGlobal Child and Maternal Health, London, UK.
Atinuke AweFive x More, London, UK.
Rachael BuabengMummy's Day Out, London, UK.
Morgan DanielNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 5, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.
Jane FisherAntenatal Results and Choices, London, UK.
Sasha HenriquesWellcome Connecting Science, Cambridge, UK.
Kerry Leeson-BeeversAlström Syndrome UK, Torquay, UK.
Lyn S ChittyNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 5, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.
Melissa HillNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 5, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrenatal testing (prenatal screening and diagnostic testing) is a central component of prenatal care in the UK. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play a key role in guiding parents through the testing pathway. Against a backdrop where Black and racially minoritised parents are disproportionately impacted by maternal health inequalities, little is known about how HCPs working in prenatal testing services navigate the delivery of equitable care in everyday practice. Understanding HCP perspectives is essential, especially as prenatal testing technology advances.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 HCPs who deliver prenatal testing across England. Interviews explored experiences of discussing prenatal testing with parents from Black and racially minoritised backgrounds, influences on delivering equitable care, and views on service improvement. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis informed by Critical Race Theory to examine how structural factors shaped practice.

resultsHCPs valued equitable care, making deliberate efforts to support parents' varying needs. However, four interrelated themes highlighted constraints on equitable delivery: unequal starting points for parents entering testing discussions; uneven clinical confidence and knowledge of genetics across the workforce; variability in support for culturally sensitive care; and reliance on informal, individual labour to address gaps in service design. These dynamics meant that equitable care was often pursued through personal adaptation rather than consistently supported systems.

conclusionsProviding equitable care cannot rely on individual effort. System-level investment in clinical education, service design, and organisational cultures that support culturally sensitive care is needed. With the expansion of prenatal genomics, addressing these structural conditions will be essential for ensuring the benefits of prenatal testing are realised equitably.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelPrenatal DiagnosisAdultEnglandFemaleHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchState MedicineAntenatal screeningGenetic testingHealthcare professionalsHealth equityHealth inequalitiesPrenatal testingQualitative analysisRace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID42121206
PMCPMC13339345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.