ArticleBMC public health2026
Perceived impact of mass media campaign messages on smoking and mental health: an online survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA common reason for smoking is perceived mental health benefits but systematic reviews have shown that stopping smoking is associated with mental health benefits such as a reduction in symptoms of anxiety and depression. This message is rarely included in mass media campaigns (MMC) for stopping smoking which largely focus on physical health. We developed animatics (early versions of videos) about the relationship between smoking cessation and mental health and evaluated several perceived impact outcomes.
methodsTwo short MMC animatics (one informational, one testimonial) were co-developed using a multi-stage process, with experts by experience and profession. In an online survey, n=1504 participants watched these two alongside an existing animatic (stress-cycle) in a randomised order. All participants currently or previously smoked or currently vaped; those with mental health conditions were oversampled (73% ≥1 mental health diagnosis, 70% past-month psychological distress). PRIMARY OUTCOME: perceived effectiveness (six items rated from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5)). Secondary outcomes included preferred animatic, relatability, and feeling a) more motivated to stop smoking, b) encouraged to seek professional support, c) more positive about the mental health benefits of stopping smoking.
resultsAll three animatics scored > 3.5 on perceived effectiveness with no difference by mental health measures. The informational animatic scored higher on some outcomes, with all effects being small or very small. There were no significant effects for ever diagnosis for any secondary outcome. People with psychological distress rated the informational and stress-cycle animatics higher than those with no or low distress. Each animatic was a favourite for about one-third of respondents, regardless of mental health status.
conclusionsSmoking cessation campaign messages highlighting mental health benefits were well-received across people with and without mental health conditions, suggesting potential to reduce smoking prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.