Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121144›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

A survey of health professions learners' attitudes towards social media in medical education: a substance use disorders education case study.

Gregory A Jaffe, Sarah Lawson, William Leach, Mallika Kodavatiganti, Erin Avanzato, Katherine Fesperman, Heather Klusaritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gregory A JaffeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St, Suite 401, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. gregory.jaffe@jefferson.edu.
Sarah LawsonSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
William LeachDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St, Suite 401, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Mallika KodavatigantiSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Erin AvanzatoSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Katherine FespermanUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Public Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Heather KlusaritzDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Andrew Mutch Building, Floor 7, 51 N. 39th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media is a ubiquitous part of the modern world and plays a key role in the dissemination of information. While utilizing social media for educational purposes has been repeatedly demonstrated as feasible, it has been underutilized in medical education and remains a critical opportunity to integrate microlearning and stigma reduction curricula.

methodsA cross-sectional survey on social media usage, attitudes, and beliefs was sent to medical and nursing students at two large academic institutions within Philadelphia. Descriptive statistics are reported, and non-parametric tests were utilized for exploratory analyses.

resultsHealth learners were low consumers of social media, reporting using the majority of social media platforms for under an hour a week each. The most used platforms were Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. Learners overwhelmingly endorsed that social media can be used to enhance health knowledge (72.4%) and as a valuable learning tool for health profession students (65.5%). The statements with the highest endorsement were that social media can influence how providers view and interact with their patients (85.1%) and that social media can be used as a tool to reduce and address bias (75.9%). While learners were skeptical of the trustworthiness of information on social media, they reported that they were able to determine whether a source was trustworthy (77.0%). Lastly, most health learners reported they would use an evidence-based social media page on a short video-based platform like Instagram or TikTok (57.5%).

conclusionsAlthough health learners may represent low social media users, they did report that they consumed and engaged with health information on social media and agreed social media could be used to enhance their health knowledge and influence their interactions with patients. This represents an opportunity in medical education to better utilize social media as a modality for microlearning, stigma reduction, and the dissemination of accurate health information from a trusted source.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEducation, MedicalSocial MediaStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposurePhiladelphiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultMedical educationSocial mediaStigma reductionSubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID42121144
PMCPMC13339691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.